Sunday, August 14, 2011

At the crossroads, again



Seldom do your weaknesses remain hidden for a long time. Like the boxed spring, they erupt as soon as the lid is removed. Indian lid, the famed batting didn’t work this series, and it was all kibosh for the Indian team. English bowlers were exemplary on their wickets, and trumped the Indian batsmen. Our bowlers on the other hand couldn’t match them, so the defeat was inevitable. You can sum up comprehensively this English summer in these few words.

India was able to maintain its top ranking for the last 18 months because of their match-winners and not because of their team. Batting ensured that the team didn’t lose many matches, and a few exemplary bowling performances nicked one or two wins. Most of India’s last series wins or draws have been thus 1-0 or 1-1 or likewise. These were enough to sustain the hold. But the pattern couldn’t have been repeated when confronted with a better team. It was a long-drawn conclusion, so the recent drubbing doesn’t come as a surprise to me.

Instead I think it might give India the need and space to rethink its future. The series defeat could be an elixir of sorts, ala the World Cup first-round exit of 2007. No better time now to take Test Matches on priority and not by default, and groom both batsmen and bowlers for their demands. It won’t happen though. Wins back in home grounds will push these concerns back into the shed until we lose again overseas, and then again back into shed …. the ugly pattern which had been a theme in the 90s. This also retrospectively brings into perspective how great our batting had been during the last decade, who transcended the system to best the conditions overseas. Alas, we realize things when they are about to leave us.

It is not an official farewell to the team though. They can again climb back to the top, but the prospects look bleak. Live with it. And on the same note, also appreciate the newly crowned champions, the English cricket team. They deserve to be number one, as they have risen here by winning matches and not jugglery, as the Indian team had during their stay. They ought not to be compared and scrutinized like a flogged and crossed king. We will have time to judge their worth when they come to the subcontinent. But for the time being, rethink or rejoice, depending on which side of the planet you belong to.

Sunday, April 3, 2011

India Wins the World Cup!!!


Not the sense of method, but the sense of timing. It is true for all the historical moments, be they of love, war or sports. Indian Cricket team achieved a unique timing orchestration during this World Cup campaign. Never renowned for its ‘hitting the straps at the right time’, in fact, having never watched it ever do it in my entire viewership career, this World Cup win might prove to be a watershed moment.

Buoy! Brilliantly they played in Quarters, Semis and Finals. Before that, they were also-runs. In knockouts they played like champions. This team is still not in the league of dominant Aussies or Windies of yore. But their spirit indeed was. The chase against Australia in quarter-finals was one of the finest, the win against Pakistan in the Semis one of the scrappiest, and the heist against Sri Lanka in the Finals one of the bravest. Their championship thus can not be contested at any ground. Sometimes, a few things other than play of bat and ball define the stuff the legends are made of.

Sadly this aspect was never associated with India. Until now. 1983 World Cup win stirred the sleeping nation. This win will instill the champion mentality, in all aspects, that are known as India. Who knows? But world, we indeed are coming.

Monday, March 28, 2011

Barack Obama on Sachin

Mr. BARAK OBAMA :- "I dont know about Cricket,But Still I watch cricket to see Sachin's Play.Not becoz I love his play its becoz to know the reason Why my country's Production 5 % down when He's in Batting."

Many of us Wonder why did he commented this ... if you want to know the reason .. read below

When Sachin Tendulkar travelled to Pakistan to face one of the finest bowling attacks ever assembled in cricket,
Michael Schumacher was yet to race a F1 car,
Lance Armstrong had never been to the Tour de France,
Diego Maradona was still the captain of a world champion Argentina team,
Pete Sampras had never won a Grand Slam.

When Tendulkar embarked on a glorious career taming Imran and company,
Roger Federer was a name unheard of
; Lionel Messi was in his nappies,
Usain Bolt was an unknown kid in the Jamaican backwaters.

The Berlin Wall was still intact, USSR was one big, big country,
Dr Manmohan Singh was yet to “open” the Nehruvian economy.
It seems while Time was having his toll on every individual on the face of this planet, he excused one man. Time stands frozen in front of Sachin Tendulkar. We have had champions, we have had legends, but we have never had another Sachin Tendulkar and we never will.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

India-South Africa Test Series 2010-11: A synopsis



In acknowledging your shortcomings lies your catharsis, and also victory. That is how I will describe the recently concluded India-SA Test Series. India achieved or managed or inflicted, whichever suits your perception, a drawn Test Series for the first time on the South African soil.

It was a series, high on octane value and also turgid on triteness index. The first Test in Centurion, where India were brushed aside by an innings was the wont indictment of India’s much-maligned off-shore records. The Durban victory in the second Test then showcased the recently acquired steely resolve of fightback in the current team, which has propelled and maintained them at the numero uno spot. The third Test in Cape Town was what demonstrated the aforementioned brilliance and banality at the same time. The 3rd day epitomized the spirit and skill of Test cricket, when Dale Steyn charged with a mix of verve and venom was dishing out some of the most lethal deliveries ever seen, and Sachin Tendulkar, with a mix of fortitude and firmness, was countering them with aplomb. It was once-in-a-year show, and frankly speaking, will bedeck my memory for some time to come. But what followed in the next two days was a massive antithesis. I should have expected it, considering India’s still-poor record in crossing over the line. Having SA effectively down for 128 for 6 on the 4th day, what India needed was just one spell of inspired bowling from one of the fast bowlers to wrap up the innings. What followed was a trivial stuff, Ishant Sharma spraying the balls on the leg side letting Boucher to get into the groove. However well Kallis played, I believe it was Indian bowlers who pulled the South Africans out of the quagmire. Good that India managed a draw on the last day to bring some parity on the proceedings, highlighting some flaw in the much-hyped South African bowling too.

The bottomline remains that India is the number one team; no one should begrudge that, as they have achieved it through winning matches and not through sorcery. They are not a finished product though, amply highlighted by their inability to finish off the series. Their weakest link continues to be their bowling. But somehow, which is beyond me too, this bowling has contrived the energy and skill to win solitary or important matches to win or draw the series. This also shows how much scope there is for improvement, and if that potential comes to roost, even the earlierAustralian/West Indian type hegemony is not out of reach.

Some say it was the best chance for India to win in SA, as the stupendous set of senior batsmen may not be at their disposal the next time around. Agreed. But it is also a far before the time conjecture. As Rahul Dravid has commented, “If we can keep a core group of 4-5 fast bowlers going well in the next few years, we can definitely continue what we have started.” I concur, and hence implore the concerned authorities to heed to the cry for better bowling stock. I have harped on this in earlier blogs too. But does it make a difference? No.

The recently organized madness of mercenary auction of IPL-4 would have driven home the point for you.